WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Russia arrests another senior Defense Ministry official in bribery chargesAP weekly sports photo galleryChinese premier urges Canton Fair to better serve opening upNINETEEN EU countries demand the right to introduce RwandaCoastal Carolina and Delaware will play homeCoastal Carolina and Delaware will play homeKentucky Derby winner Mystik Dan settles in at Pimlico ahead of the PreaknessFilibuster by Missouri Democrats stretches into a second day. What's the fight about?Maths teacher Rebecca Joynes, 30, accused of sleeping with two of her 15Connecticut GOP faces potential Aug. 13 primary to choose final candidate to challenge Sen. Murphy
2.3201s , 6505.5859375 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property ,Culture Craft news portal